Ungazama isikhathi eside uma uthanda ukuqonda ukuthi i-classic yaseRussia yayifuna ukusho ukuthini ngeminye yemisebenzi yakhe, kodwa inqobo nje uma sibheka umbhalo wakhe kuphela ngombono wombhalo, ngeke siphume phansi. . Isikhathi sokuxhuma isazi sokusebenza kwengqondo.
Ingabe u-Chatsky uhlakaniphile?
Sihlala sibabonga yini labo abasivula amehlo kithi? Mhlawumbe ikusasa lizofakazela ukunemba kwalawa ma-harbinger ahlakaniphile esikhathi esisha. Kodwa esikhathini lapho iningi lisafuna ukubambelela kokwaziyo, lo esimbona njengosongo odabeni oluvele lukhona emhlabeni uyazondwa yithi. Unjalo uChatsky.
Uthi uyabona, kodwa ubona okuningi, ngoba, ngemva kokushiya eMoscow, wandise imibono yakhe engakaze ibe mincane mayelana nezwe, uyakwazi ukubheka konke okwenzeka emphakathini waseMoscow kusukela ku-meta-position, kusuka phezulu. Umbuzo uwukuthi, ingabe kufanelekile ukubika lokho okubonayo njalo futhi kuyadingeka ukwabelana ngalokho okuqaphelayo ngaphandle kombuzo ophikisayo, ngisho nangokucasuka okumangalelayo? Bekungeke yini kube ngcono ukugcina iqiniso lingajabulisi kwabanye?
Ukwehlisa inani elithandekayo kothandekayo wakho akuyona indlela eshesha kakhulu enhliziyweni yakhe
Abanothando, abantu abangaphambi kwesikhathi sabo, bahlala beyizisulu. Ngokuvamile zibhujiswa inkathi ephikisana nokuqamba izinto ezintsha. I-Chatsky ayibhujiswanga ngokomzimba. Kodwa wenqaba. Kubhekwa njengokuhlanya. Imbangi yakhe ephumelela kakhulu ezindabeni zomuntu siqu, uMolchalin, inamakhono okuxhumana athuthuke kakhudlwana. Ukuzithoba ku-Chatsky ngobuhle namakhono, engenangqondo ehlakaniphile noma ubuntu obukhanyayo, uyazi into ebalulekile: ukuzivumelanisa nesimo, ukusho lokho abafuna ukukuzwa.
Kuyadabukisa ukuthi, ngokukhohlisa ukoma kwabantu ukuzwa izinto ezijabulisayo, nguMolchalin owamukela ukuqashelwa. Kodwa ngemva kwakho konke, u-Chatsky ohlakaniphile ufuna okufanayo, ngoba lokhu ubuyela othandekayo wakhe kusukela ekusesheni nasekuhambeni. Futhi ... ukhuluma kuphela ngaye nangemibono yakhe ngomhlaba. Uhlasela konke okubalulekile kuSophia wakhe oyigugu bese elahlekelwa.
Kubonakala sengathi ukwehlisa inani eliyigugu kothandekayo wakho akuyona indlela eshesha kakhulu enhliziyweni yakhe. Kunalokho, okuphambene kuyiqiniso: kungakhathaliseki ukuthi iqiniso libaluleke kangakanani, uma licekela phansi okuthile okubalulekile ohlelweni lwemibono yomunye, lokhu akuholeli ekusondelaneni, kodwa ekulahlekelweni.
Ingabe uChatsky wayengenza ngendlela ehlukile?
Iqhawe lethu lenza ngokuvumelana nezindinganiso zalo. Ungomunye walabo abakulungele ukudingiswa, ukuze nje balondoloze ubuntu. Ngeke ayikhaphele imibono yakhe ngisho nangezindleko zokulahlekelwa ubudlelwano. Iqiniso libaluleke kakhulu kuye kunothando. Inhlekelele yakhe ukuthi amantombazane ngaleso sikhathi ayethembele kakhulu embonweni womphakathi, isikhathi samantombazane aseTurgenev ayethanda amavukela-mbuso omlilo ayengakafiki. Ngakho-ke - "phuma eMoscow, angisezi lapha!".
Yeka ukuthi kunzima kanjani ngoChatsky nabanye abafana naye ukudlala imidlalo yokuxhumana nabantu! Kulokhu, isiphetho sabo isizungu, ukucinga izindawo «lapho kukhona ekhoneni umuzwa ocasuliwe.» Futhi, maye, khona-ke umphakathi ulahlekelwa ingqondo ehlakaniphile, okuyinto, ngeshwa, ayikwazi ukuqaphela nokwazisa, futhi ama-Chatskys alahlekelwa abalandeli nabathandekayo babo.